Is Bing Making Google Better?Competition Breeds Better User Experience
On Monday I blogged about the Jason Calacanis challenge and how he received a 21% increase in traffic with only 10% of the changes being made so far. Many people have been wondering what the 10% of the changes were and some have even blogged that it could have been a fluke.
Just to give everyone a better understanding of how I calculated the 21% increase, I first took the 6 days before SEO was done and compared it to 6 other days roughly 20 days after SEO was implemented. The data before SEO was done was a bit biased because on one of the days his traffic doubled because he wrote on the Oscars and the following day his traffic returned to normal. On that Monday, if he had normal traffic and did not blog on the Oscars his search traffic due to SEO would have increased by over 40%.

For those of you who are wondering what changes have been made so far, they are related to the title tag and meta descriptions of post pages.
Post titles where: The Jason Calacanis Weblog - [Name of post entry]
New Post titles: [Name of post entry]
Meta description tags before were blank and contained nothing.
New meta description: [First 20 or so words from the post]
These overall changes cause a few things from my understanding:
And as promised here is some education on SEO (some contrary to "popular" belief):
Granted there could have been other things that caused an increase in your search traffic such as more links, but due to all of this I am confident that there was a good increase in search traffic from SEO. This is not a quick fix but instead a healthy way to organically improve search traffic. Either way I will still keep up my end of the deal. :)
Tag:
Is Bing Making Google Better?