Quantcast

Bill Gates: Google’s Internet Balloons Won’t Help Kids Dying of Malaria

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:


Bill Gates: Google’s Internet Balloons Won’t Help Kids Dying of Malaria
[ Technology]

Back in June Google announced Project Loon, an initiative to bring the internet to remote areas via giant balloons that float around stratospheric winds and beam access down to people on the ground. Google knows that it’s an ambitious program. They’ve called it a “moonshot” and even the name suggests that it’s a rather loony idea.

Now, Bill Gates is questioning whether Google’s internet balloons can really help those in impoverished areas fight the real battles they face.

In an extensive interview with Bloomberg, Gates was asked whether bringing internet access to underdeveloped areas can help to solve problems. This was his pointed response:

“When you’re dying of malaria, I suppose you’ll look up and see that balloon, and I’m not sure how it’ll help you. When a kid gets diarrhea, no, there’s no website that relieves that. Certainly I’m a huge believer in the digital revolution. And connecting up primary-health-care centers, connecting up schools, those are good things. But no, those are not, for the really low-income countries, unless you directly say we’re going to do something about malaria.”

I mean, Gates has a point here. There’s no immediate benefit to kids dying of malaria that can be afforded by a giant, floating balloon that gives internet access. But it’s always been Google’s assertion that expanding internet access to underprivileged areas can lead to a ton of secondary benefits. Sure, accessing a website can’t cure disease – but it can provide information on how one would go about preventing or treating disease. Plus, institutions that help to deal with the real problems faced by the poor can be aided immensely by reliable internet access.

And in response to Gates’ comments, you have to ask the question: are all charitable institutions made equal? Shouldn’t Google focus on providing free internet access to poor areas – since that’s something that they would presumably be quite qualified to do? Can’t Google’s Project Loon provide an equal, but different benefit to the same people Gates is trying to help with his numerous programs to eradicate disease?

Gates also had something to say on Google’s other charitable initiatives – mainly their philanthropic arm Google.org:

“Google started out saying they were going to do a broad set of things. They hired Larry Brilliant, and they got fantastic publicity. And then they shut it all down. Now they’re just doing their core thing. Fine. But the actors who just do their core thing are not going to uplift the poor.”

I wouldn’t call this “shots fired” or anything. It’s obviously just a difference in principle, and in methods for helping the underprivileged. But it does come off as dismissive. What do you think?

Bill Gates: Google’s Internet Balloons Won’t Help Kids Dying of Malaria
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • http://www.travel-lists.co.uk AlastairMcK

    No, but they won’t harm them either, and they might help disseminate information about malaria in remote areas off the grid. Then Sergey Brin’s lab-grown meat might feed them.

    It’s a bit irrelevant really. Will electric bicycles help kids with malaria? No, but that’s not a reason to stop developing them.

  • http://www.webpronews.com/author/chris-crum Chris Crum

    How does he feel about their crisis response maps?

  • louis

    Well, electric bicycles will not go to those countries and here Google specific details project is “in developing and 3rd world countries”. if they developed in general, no one says you have to stop. Get the point? Man, you guys are just GOOGLE fans they said 1 you say yes, they say 1 + 1 = 3 you say “thats correct”, lol. Get out of here.

  • wmaster

    google broke human’s lifes as wind play with balloons. What I can say more? This company not have idea what is humanity.

  • perdix711

    Both sides have serious merit, not worth taking narrow sighted critical views for personal media gain. Much of impoverishment in these areas is the direct result of repressive & violent regimes. Communication and knowledge is fundamental in escaping beyond political borders & rebuilding. Obviously, neither solution by itself will fix the many prevalent issues there. perdix711

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom