Quantcast

Apple Acknowledges That Samsung Didn’t Copy The iPad… Kind Of

Get the WebProNews Newsletter:
Apple Acknowledges That Samsung Didn’t Copy The iPad… Kind Of
[ Technology]

Earlier this year, a UK court ruled that Samsung didn’t infringe upon Apple’s patents in regards to the company’s Galaxy Tab devices. Normally, it would have ended there, but the judge also ruled that Apple must put a notice on its Web site acknowledging that Samsung didn’t copy the iPad. The notice was supposed to go up today and Apple didn’t disappoint.

If you head over to Apple’s UK Web site, you’ll see a small link at the bottom of the page that says, “Samsung/Apple UK Judgment.” The link takes you to a white page with the following statement:

On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet Computer, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s registered design No. 0000181607-0001. A copy of the full judgment of the High court is available on the following link www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2012/1882.html.

In the ruling, the judge made several important points comparing the designs of the Apple and Samsung products:

“The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking. Overall it has undecorated flat surfaces with a plate of glass on the front all the way out to a very thin rim and a blank back. There is a crisp edge around the rim and a combination of curves, both at the corners and the sides. The design looks like an object the informed user would want to pick up and hold. It is an understated, smooth and simple product. It is a cool design.”

“The informed user’s overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following. From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design; but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back. They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool.”

That Judgment has effect throughout the European Union and was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 18 October 2012. A copy of the Court of Appeal’s judgment is available on the following link www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/1339.html. There is no injunction in respect of the registered design in force anywhere in Europe.

However, in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design. A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple’s design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc. So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple’s far more popular iPad.

At this point, Apple is being the bratty kid you knew in first grade. They apologize after being called out for it, but it’s not much of an apology. It’s the kind of passive-agressive stance that’s more funny than anything.

Apple has hidden away the above statement on its Web site, but the statement is also to be published in newspapers and magazines across the UK. It will be interesting to see if Apple changes its tune in the print version.

[h/t: iMore]

Apple Acknowledges That Samsung Didn’t Copy The iPad… Kind Of
Top Rated White Papers and Resources
  • kevin

    You are so right. Samsung, or should we call them SAMEsung, came out with the tablet product first…. SAMEsung never would have had a tablet product had Apple not introduced one! Get a clue…. no copying there. not to mention other aspects of it…

  • http://www.delacom.co Jason

    My office has a roof like the Apple stores. Uh oh.

  • Join for Access to Our Exclusive Web Tools
  • Sidebar Top
  • Sidebar Middle
  • Sign Up For The Free Newsletter
  • Sidebar Bottom