Quantcast

Amanda Knox Allegedly Connected To Known Cocaine Dealer

    July 31, 2014
    Lacy Langley
    Comments are off for this post.

Amanda Knox is preparing for her last ditch effort at an appeal in Italy’s highest appeals court. She will try to overturn her conviction of murdering her roommate Meredith Kercher. That is enough for anyone to be anxious about, but now it seems she has a few other problems to deal with.

It was revealed recently that Amanda Knox allegedly had a sexual relationship with a cocaine dealer who allegedly repeatedly sold drugs to a man named Luciano who allegedly stabbed his brother 16 times with a kitchen knife. This allegedly occurred a year before Meredith Kercher was murdered. Amanda Knox’s alleged connections to the cocaine dealer, who investigators refer to as “F”, weren’t mentioned in her murder trial.

This “F” was reportedly a psychology student from Rome. It is said that he met Amanda Knox on a train from Milan to Florence and shared a joint with her. The two then developed a relationship that investigators deemed to be of a “supposedly sexual nature”. His phone number was found in her phone and records showed that the two were in contact often.

It was assumed that “F” also sold drugs to Amanda Knox.

However, it seems that this new information may not have any effect on Amanda Knox.

Giuliano Mignini, the magistrate in charge of the investigation into Meredith Kercher’s murder, said Wednesday that he considered the new revelations irrelevant to Amanda Knox’s case.

He said of Amanda Knox’s case, “We have three sentences, one of which is definite and we are at the final stages of the process – this will not change anything.”

Mignini added that new evidence wouldn’t even be admitted into Amanda Knox‘s appeal hearing.

Basically, when it comes to the conviction of Amanda Knox, this new information really doesn’t matter when the facts are examined that relate to the murder of Meredith Kercher.

“We ran down many leads and at the end we were left with three people who left traces in the house.” Mignini said.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zC2Ci93mKEg

The appeal that Amanda Knox has made for her innocence will be over soon. Only time will tell if she will face punishment or freedom.

Image via YouTube


  • artsloverforever

    Amanda soooo guilty.

    • fb4ever

      You mean sooooo NOT guilty!

      • fryer01

        no….she means GUILTY !!!!!!! plain to see….she is not so sweet after all…

        • sillystrings

          she’s never been sweet.but that is irrelevant to her guilt. She is guilty based on the evidence. this cocaine stuff was not part of the trial.

          • Lysa De Thomas

            Whether she was sweet or not has nothing to do with her guilt. The only thing that matters is what the facts say, and when you look at the facts, not the rummors and myths that so greatly surround this case, you realize that she’s innocent. Not one piece of Amanda’s DNA was found in Meredith’s room.

          • sillystrings

            Did I say her not being sweet has something to do with guilt? No (although murderers are not sweet) it also has nothing to do withproving guilt. The factsdo however, and thefacts prove beyond reasonable doubt she is guilty. Your understanding of facts and evidence is severely lacking.

          • Lysa De Thomas

            I do know the facts, quite well. I’ve read the trial transcripts in Italian. Have you, or have you just been reading the tabloids?

          • sillystrings

            tabloids right… don’t be so obtuse. I, like all the competent Judges (actually they know more as not everything is public) know the facts, which lead to an obvious conclusion of guilt.

      • sc_cannon

        Amanda is more innocent of the crime than the guys who lived downstairs. It was them that originally brought Guede into the house. The fact that ghouls keep coming out of the walls like this drug dealer, sillystring, and others means nothing.

        • sillystrings

          facts and truth mean everything. your comment is stupid.

    • Guest

      I think you’re right.

    • Elle Chanel

      You retarded fucking idiot.

    • Fredly

      Knox’s hair was tested for cocaine when she was arrested. She tested negative. She never used cocaine in Italy.

      • SR Bach

        Please provide an actual reputable source to back up your claim that Knox’s hair sample “had tested negative for cocaine.”

        Tell us how you know with such certainty that Knox “never used cocaine in Italy.”

        Thanks in advance.

        • Fredly

          It is in Barbie Nadeau’s book.

          • SR Bach

            You mean when she refers to the traces of NARCOTICS that were detected in the the hair samples taken on November 6, 2007?

          • Fredly

            So tiny that they couldn’t be used.

  • mike

    Now at last, we know the truth. It as a hit. Knox had to bump off her partner because she was about to rat them out to he fuzz. Concrete shoes. This is turning from a intense, drawn out CSI episode into a Monty Python skit.

    • fb4ever

      Sure, and one day someone will tell you about SANTA CLAUS!

    • vinceNYC

      and you base that on???

    • JustJenna

      Sounds like another “brilliant” theory for the prosecutor to use, since none of the others stuck.

      • SR Bach

        Do you even bother to read the articles you comment on?

        The prosecutor considers Amanda Knox’s drug connection “irrelevant” to her murder case. Do you know the meaning of the word “irrelevant?”

        This Knox drug connection evidence won’t be admitted at her appeal hearing. The prosecutor has known about this drug connection for years. The prosecution realized the case against Knox in the murder of Meredith Kercher was strong enough WITHOUT USING THIS additional evidence.

        Here’s a cut and paste section taken from the article above, that you evidently didn’t read:

        “Giuliano Mignini, the magistrate in charge of the investigation into
        Meredith Kercher’s murder, said Wednesday that he considered the new revelations irrelevant to Amanda Knox’s case.

        He said of Amanda Knox’s case, “We have three sentences, one of which is definite and we are at the final stages of the process – this will not change anything.”

        Mignini added that new evidence wouldn’t even be admitted into Amanda Knox‘s appeal hearing.”

        • JustJenna

          I *did* read it. I was being snarky. Look it up.

  • fb4ever

    Oh Yes, and next they will tell she was the grand dam of a prostitution ring! Get a life.

    • Will

      Nope…I think she just gave it away!!!

  • golchie2

    I wonder if the US will extradite her to Italy? If I was her, I would flee to another small Country and take on a new identify

    • jajaja

      Yes they will. They have no choice and Knox cannot fight it.

      • JustJenna

        Keep telling yourself, that.

  • astrope

    so she bought pot from him in italy. bfd
    rudy admitted he killed Meredith

    • sillystrings

      noRudy did not admit he killed Meredith.

      • DevlinW

        Um, excuse me. He pleaded guilty to the crime; it’s on the record. Let’s not indulge in revisionist history.

        • sillystrings

          no he did NOT plead guilty. it’s on the record. let’s not try to change history because of your personal bias, or is it just ignorance of the facts of the case?

          • DevlinW

            Well, it’s your ignorance or lack of honesty that’s showing now. Either way, I guess we can dismiss you as being worthy of any further response.

          • sillystrings

            yes you are wrong but won’t admit it. keep on living in a fantasy world.

          • Norman Kember

            You are a typical Knox groupie – an immoral idiot who just lies and lies and lies.

          • Smalldeer

            You just describe every single guilter out there. The people lying are the guilters who repeat the lies of the police/Mignini.

          • Nell

            Rudy Guede admitted to being at the house when Meredith Kercher was killed, but he denied any involvement in the crime. He did NOT plead guilty.

          • JustJenna

            It’s kind of creepy for you to use Meredith’s picture, like you actually knew her or something. =/

          • SR Bach

            Creepy? Why do you think it’s “creepy” to remember a murder victim?

            Meredith’s lovely photo is a reminder that a beautiful young woman with a promising future (and a radiant smile) was tortured and murdered, in a brutal, senseless murder perpetrated by three killers. Two of the three killers who overpowered Meredith seem to resent any mention of Meredith. Guess which two killers I am referring to. The two killers’ fan clubs can not tolerate any mention of Meredith, nor can they acknowledge for one moment the terrible suffering of the Kercher family.

            Amanda Knox and her handlers would like you to forget the victim, forget her life, forget what she looks like, forget that Meredith has a family who adores her, a family that has been suffering unimaginably for nearly seven years.

            All the while, Amanda Knox struggles to pronounce her victim’s name. All she can manage is to repeat: “I did not kill my friend.” Why doesn’t Amanda Knox say plainly: “I didn’t kill Meredith Kercher.” Why it is so difficult for her to say the name, aloud? Why is it so difficult for Amanda Knox to say the name “MEREDITH KERCHER?”

          • JustJenna

            You really have a problem. An essay length response to my one sentence. Seems you are a bit obsessed. I can think it’s creepy for strangers to use photographs of Meredith if I want to.

          • SR Bach

            Oh, I’m so sorry about your reading comprehension problems. You poor thing.

            I suspect you have difficulties in basic counting, as well as your struggles in reading and writing. (That would explain why you called your previous comment a “one word sentence.”)

            Words strung together in sentences (in essay form! Egad!) intimidate and overwhelm you. Next time, I’ll know that you need information presented to you shortened and dumbed-down.

            You, like most of the members of Amanda’s Fan Club have the attention span of a toddler. Letting facts get in the way of your opinion? NO WAY! Ain’t gonna happen!

            You are so right about me being “a bit obsessed.” I’m glad it shows. I am obsessed. Obsessed about fairness, justice and truth. At the moment, the focus, I mean MY OBSESSION is seeing fairness, justice and truth achieved for Meredith Kercher. Do you remember her? She’s the young woman whose photograph you find “creepy.”

          • JustJenna

            Wow. What kind of person attacks a random stranger’s reading and mathematical skills without having any knowledge of them? do you think Meredith would approve of the way you behave? From all accounts she was a kind and lovely person, completely unlike the way you present yourself to be.

            Also, don’t twist my words. You are perfectly aware that I didn’t say Meredith’s picture was creepy. Unless you are just that thick.

          • SR Bach

            Lighten up. It wasn’t an attack, it was written in the style YOU use. It’s called “snark”–remember? (Refer to your previous post, to refresh your recollection about “snark.” Or, “look it up.”)

            You wrote to me, (i.e., “a random stranger”) that I “really have a problem” because I gave an “essay-length response” to your one-word [now corrected to just “one”] sentence.” You attempted to diminish what I said, not by responding to the content of what I said. But by labeling me “obsessed” because of the length of my response. And oh,you didn’t hesitate to add that I might also be “thick.” To use your own rhetorical question back at you: “What kind of person does that?”

            Please note that I’ve quoted from your post because I certainly wouldn’t want to twist your words.

            You wrote that you thought it was “creepy” that Nell uses a picture of Meredith Kercher as her avatar. But now you say that the photo Nell uses is NOT creepy?

            It’s not at all clear what you exactly you find “creepy” about Nell using a beautiful photo of Meredith Kercher, a young woman whom you’ve just described as a “kind and lovely person.”

            to an “essay length” response.

            You really have a problem. An essay length response to my one sentence.
            Seems you are a bit obsessed. I can think it’s creepy for strangers to
            use photographs of Meredith if I want to.

          • JustJenna

            Whatever. Have a nice life.

          • Lysa De Thomas

            Ad hominem attacks only show what kind of person you are and have nothing to do with the actual facts.

          • Lysa De Thomas

            Yes, she was a beautiful girl who was killed in a senseless murder and that is horrendous,but vilifying an innocent girls does not justify what happens.

          • sillystrings

            no one has vilified any innocent “girls” if you mean Knox and Sollecito

          • sillystrings

            ignorance is obviously your purview.

        • Jan

          He didn’t plead guilty, you idiot – go back to your day time TV. Cretin.

        • Guest

          um, excuse me. no he did not plead guilty; it’s on the record, and the 2 appeals he had. let’s not indulge in your fantasy world.

        • SR Bach

          It’s “on the record?”

          Oh and what record would that be?–the imaginary broken record in your head which plays over and over again that “the black guy did it–the black guy did it -the black guy did it !!!?”

          No, “um” I can’t and won’t “excuse you.” Your comment about revisionist history is rich coming from someone who misstates basic facts about this case. Would that be your ignorance or should it be chalked up to your blatant bias–or both?

          FACT: Rudy Guede was convicted of MURDER IN COMPLICITY WITH OTHERS. The “others” are the two other convicted defendants: Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito.

      • Guest

        Maybe he didn’t “admit it” but the load he left in the toilet of the house was enough to link him to the scene. DNA

        • Smalldeer

          More like the DNA he left INSIDE Meredith proves he’s guilty.

        • sillystrings

          and your point is?
          BTW there was no DNA in the poop – he admitted it was his – and it was his- he didn’t clean up
          someone else did . . .

          • JustJenna

            Nobody cleaned it up. It slid farther down in the toilet so it couldn’t be seen at first glance.

          • sillystrings

            I know.
            Guede didn’t clean up.
            AK/RS did. (but not the poop of course)

          • Lysa De Thomas

            No they didn’t. It was one of the things that freaked Amanda out. She knew it didn’t belong to the other girls in the house since they would flush toilet and were quite tidy. So it worried her. Then when they went back in the house, the poop had slid down the toilet and she thought it was gone. This really upset her. She wondered if the murderer was still in the house our nearby. So she made Raffaele tell one of the officers that it was gone. The officer check on it, and told them that it was still there. Sadly, this interaction has been twisted to infer that she lies. It also shows that you don’t know the facts of the case.

          • sillystrings

            Guedehad no reason to clean up.And he didn’t. AKand RS did. You are the one that doesn’t know the facts. didn’t say AK or RS flushed the toilet; of course they didn’t!

          • Lysa De Thomas

            Lol- Rudy had no reason to clean up? Right, he knew that he was innocent and so had no problem with fingerprints in her blood being at a murder scene, his DNA inside Meridith, his footprint in her blood on the floor, his finger prints in her purse, and on her phones, only go to show that he was innocent, …

            Meanwhile, Amanda and Raffaele, had a reason to somehow go to the microscopic level and clean up their trail, even if it was true, it is a physical impossibility.

          • sillystrings

            you should laugh at your own logical fallacy Guede did not clean up – if he had he most certainly would have flushed the toilet! he is guilty
            AK and RS did have reason to clean up and stage the scene.

          • Lysa De Thomas

            I was being sarcastic. I’m so sorry it went over your head,

            Let me get your thinking straight. Since Rudy was innocent, he didn’t need to remove his finger and foot prints in Meredith’s blood, on her wall, floor, sheets, pillow, phones, and purse, as well as all his DNA throughout the room, but Amanda and Raffaele are guilty, so they did have to clean up and they did, leaving only Rudy’s DNA and prints.

            You are aware that that is a physical impossibility, right?

          • sillystrings

            again with the stupidity.
            waste of time.

            The court must look at the circumstantial evidence as a whole, not as individual parts. It is a mosaic of proof.

          • Lysa De Thomas

            And as a whole, it is physically impossible for three people to commit a crime and then two of them remove all traces of themselves without disturbing the third’s.

          • sillystrings

            repeating your stupidity over and over won’t make it become intelligent. LOL

          • Lysa De Thomas

            True, repeating stupidity does not make it true! neither does continuously making ad hominem attacks, so why don’t you stop?

            When you can show me that peer reviewed, data that proves that three people can commit a crime and then two remove all evidence of them being there, down to the microscopic level, without disturbing either the physical or chromosomal evidence of the third, I’ll be happy to change my mind, until then, Amanda and Raffaele are innocent.

          • sillystrings

            NO ONE EVER SAID THAT’S WHAT HAPPENED.
            thus, your stupidity continues. no ad hominem attacks, just the truth.

          • Lysa De Thomas

            Lol- calling the person you are debating stupid is an ad hominem attack.

            So, that’s not what you said? Really? Then who said this?

            “I know.
            Guede didn’t clean up.
            AK/RS did.” [sic]

            Or this…

            “Guedehad no reason to clean up. And he didn’t. Akand RS did.” [sic]

          • sillystrings

            again with your comprehension problem. everything I said is accurate.

          • Lysa De Thomas

            Absolutely, additionally making ad hominen attacks does not make your position correct, in fact it often indicates that the person has no actual facts to go by. So why do you continue?

            I’ll tell you what, I’m all for changing my mind, doing a complete 180 and calling Amanda and Raffaele killers if you can give me peer reviewed scientific proof that three people can commit a very bloody violent crime, then two of them can go into the crime scene and remove every trace of evidence, down to the molecular level, and leave the third’s completely untouched. For such an intellegent, highly knowledgable individual as yourself, that should be a simple task.

          • sillystrings

            no, the truth makes my position correct.
            Why do YOU continue with absolutely no facts to back up your STUPID position?
            Again, no ever said that’s what happened, so, again, your “position” is inane, nonsense, and based on bias, or just pure incompetence.

          • Lysa De Thomas

            You are funny aren’t you? I give you facts to support my opinion, as well as tell you that I will change my opinion if you actually prove you side logically, and you state I don’t have any. So, attacking people who have an opposing belief as opposed to stating facts, is you way of bringing justice? That’s so sad.

          • sillystrings

            your so-called “facts” are not facts; they are a result of your incomprehension and bias. I am not attacking, just stating the facts. You are sad.

          • sillystrings

            FYI Guede’s fingerprints were not found on Merediths purse nor on her phones, nor in Meredith’s blood.

          • Lysa De Thomas

            LOL- there was no DNA in the poop? Of course there was.

          • sillystrings

            THE POOP COULD NOT BE IDENTIFIED THROUGH DNA.that is a fact.

  • wjjr2417

    She was found guilty once and spent 4 yrs in prison then they found her innocent and allowed her to leave the country now they come back and everyone story has changed and they found her guilty and now there a new cocain dealer in the picture the boyfriend story has changed !!!! This whole thing has been handled very poorly and I am really convinced that there is no way to really know the truth !! I think as a American citizen I would hope that we would not extradite MS Knox to Italy.
    I think that if the Italian Governement want to convict Ms Knox come state your case in a US court room if she found guilty then she can go to prison here in the USA.
    They already had her in a Italian prison and released her.

    • sillystrings

      nothing has changed.she’s always been guilty, still is. the boyfriend’s storyhas changed before as has Knox’s – no one else’s has. The Italian criminal system is Just as valid and reliable as the US, if not more.

    • Lisa Comeau

      There was no dna of AK at the murder scene, (maybe something about a bra clasp, minute) anyway, one will never know the truth 100% but there is no doubt her first trial was unfair. With a different language and country, bad fist trial, imprisioned for 4 yrs, released, they should let it go. Meridith is at peace. And AK and God knows the truth.

      • Michelle

        Seems like Amanda was quite fluent in Italian–she studied it in school for six years and she was able to find all those sexual partners and drug dealers with her limited language of that country. Amanda admitted that she was drug crazed at the time of the murder and that she couldn’t remember much about that night.

        • Fredly

          She was drug tested and tested negative for drugs. Smoking hash does not make you drug crazed.

          • SR Bach

            Please provide evidence for your assertion that “she was

            drug tested and tested negative for drugs.” Amanda Knox admitted IN COURT to using drugs the night of the murder.

          • Fredly

            In Barbie Nadeau’s book she mentions that Knox’s hair was tested for drugs and came up negative. Knox admitted to using hash which is basically pot. Mignini is trying to falsely smear Knox once again by implying she was a heavy coke user with ties to a coke dealing ring. People like you eat it up with no proof.

          • sillystrings

            it’s all an evil conspiracy . . . Mignini .. . . oooooo
            boy, you are gullible.

        • Lisa Comeau

          Does not explain the lack of DNA at a brutal crime scene.

          • sillystrings

            no explanation is needed. lack of DNA does not mean that someone was not there. You should contact your local jurisdiction and tell them they have let out all the murderers they locked up with NO DNA EVIDENCE. LOL

        • Lysa De Thomas

          Sounds like it? I think you need to go over the facts again. She couldn’t get through a complete sentence in Italian at the time of the murder. She was taking an intermediate Italian course at college, and she never said that she was drug crazed that night or any other.

      • sillystrings

        the trial was more than fair, and then the automatic appeals. Knox DNAwas at the murder scene

        • Lisa Comeau

          No dna at scene

          • sillystrings

            yes there was. now, put your fingers in your ears and cover your eyes, and continue to live in an alternate reality.

          • Lysa De Thomas

            No there wasn’t any of Amanda’s or Raffaele’s DNA at the murder scene. Read the trial transcripts. There was plenty of Rudy’s though – in the house, toilet, room mixed in with her blood, and horribly, in her.

          • sillystrings

            there was DNA of all 3 murderers at the scene. there was not “plenty” of any of them. and there was noGuede DNA in the toilet.
            Apparently you can’t read.

          • Lysa De Thomas

            I read quite well, and I know not only the facts of the case, but the science behind it. Poop certainly carries DNA.

          • sillystrings

            obviously you don’t. THE POOP HAD NO DNA. live with it. It’s the reality.

      • SR Bach

        Lisa Comeau:

        Please provide evidence for why the “original trial was unfair.”

        A few corrections:

        It was actually Raffaele Sollecito’s DNA found on the bra clasp.
        It was Amanda Knox’s DNA found on the handle of one of the murder weapons. Meredith’s DNA was found on the tip of the blade of that knife. That knife had been thoroughly scrubbed (Why had that one knife been bleached and scrubbed so vigorously?)and despite the attempt to erase evidence, that pesky Amanda Knox DNA lingered as did the victim’s DNA. What was Meredith’s DNA doing on the tip of a knife at Raffaele Sollecito’s flat?

        Lisa, if your sister had been viciously tortured in a sustained attack by three killers who slashed her throat and sexually assaulted her… If your loved one had been restrained in such a way that she had no way to defend herself (both arms held back) while her throat was slit from ear to ear , and was left to die alone, a long, painful gruesome death… would you be content to just… “let it go?”

        Would four years in prison be sufficient sentence for the first-degree murder of YOUR loved one?

        Sounds like Miss Sensitivity, Amanda Knox whose only desire after the murder of her “good friend” was “to get on with [her] life.

        • Lisa Comeau

          Chill love, I never said she was innocent. From what I read her trial appeared unfair. So threatening, neither of us were there

        • Lysa De Thomas

          No, the knife found in Raffaelle’s house, did have traces of Amanda’s DNA on it. But the other DNA was found to be RYE BREAD. Not one trace of Meridith’s DNA was found at Raffaele’s.

          The bra clasp was found to have minute traces of Raffaele’s DNA.. and that was after it had been lying on the floor for weeks, trampled on by multiple investigators, was found on the other end of the room under a rug, and then was picked up and handled over and over by investigators with dirty gloves. ( if you want proof of the validity of these statements check the transcripts of the second trial, these facts were one of the main reasons they were exonerated.)

          As far as three killers, well, since there is only the DNA of one, Rudy, it’s quite obvious that only one person killed Poor Meredith. You can’t selectively clean up DNA.

          • sillystrings

            all experts confirmed it as Meredith’s DNA.
            “rye bread” – LOL LOL LOL – does not have a human DNA profile.
            The bra clasp had a full profile of Knifeboy’s DNA. It wasn’t trampled on, and was not at the other end of the room. It was a sealed crime scene; the delay mostly due to defence delay tactics: DNA of Guede found at the same time (but that counts of course LOL).
            There was no second trial, but the first appeal consisted almost entirely of logical fallacies which is why it was thrown out.
            There is DNA of all 3 killers that was found at the crime scene. Plus you don’t need DNA for a conviction and the lack of it does NOT mean you were not there; plus NO ONE SAID ANYONE SELECTIVELY CLEANED DNA. the fact that you keep saying it just shows how ridiculously idiotic your whole position is.

    • Michelle

      duh………..that is not how the justice system works. The country where the crime is committed is where the courts decide the verdict. Otherwise Amanda would choose to be tried in Washington, her home state where the media believes every word her publicity agents peddle. Shows that if you have enough money, you can get away with murder.

      • Fredly

        This case never would have come to trial in America because there is no evidence against Knox.

      • sillystrings

        yes in the US she’d be in prison, and had maybe one short appeal. and of course it would have come to trial (to say otherwise only shows you are in biased delusion land)

    • Fredly

      Knox had her hair tested for drug use and she tested negative. Mignini knows this, but once again he using the press to character assassinate Knox. If they think she was part of some drug ring they’ve have 7 years of trials to prove it.

      • sillystrings

        Mignini has nothing to do with putting out this story. Wake up.

  • rehabilitated_horemonger

    hard to believe doesnt know what happened after more things start leaking out

  • fryer01

    NO SURPRISE HERE…she is one naughty gal….

    • DevlinW

      She may be naughty, I don’t know, but that’s not enough to make her guilty of anything. Your bias is obvious. Wouldn’t it be nice if the prosecution picked a theory of the crime that was actually supported by evidence of some sort and stuck to it? Every time they go into court they have a different theory of what happened and why? How come they have to change theories so often? Because the evidence doesn’t support any of them. If being “naughty” is a crime, charge Amanda Knox with that. I’m pretty sure the penalty for that, even in Italy where the Prime Minister has prostitutes for mistresses while in office, is less than the time she already served. The problem is that would mean the Italians would have to admit they were wrong when they first convicted her and they’re still wrong while they try to convict her again with less real evidence (not that made-up junk they’re throwing out now). They can’t seem to bring themselves to admit that because they would lose face.

      • sillystrings

        your bias is obvious. theories about motive are not arequired element to prove guiltsince no one can know the motives of the 3. The evidence, all of it, supports a finding of guilt of all 3. All the evidence is real, and not made-up. If you want to see things that are made up, check out the 2 killers’ books, their statements, their interviews . ..
        as for lose face – LOL LOL LOL

        • DevlinW

          You may not think motive is a required element to be proven but no sane jury is going to convict someone of any crime, much less murder, if there isn’t some credible theory of why they did it. Lots of people had the means and the opportunity to commit this crime, but most of them had no reason (motive) to do so. If you can’t explain why someone committed a crime, don’t go near a courtroom. Any competent DA will tell you that.

          • June

            Knox and Sollecito were found guilty by juries, you absolute cretin.

          • Fredly

            And they were found innocent by another jury.

          • sillystrings

            it’s not what I “think” it is a fact.
            and there is a credible theory of why they did it.
            they in fact did have a motive to do it. it’s not a reasonable motive because murderers are not “reasonable” but it is a motive.

        • Lysa De Thomas

          What evidence? No DNA of either Amanda or Raffaele at the crime scene, but tons of Rudy’s? You can’t selectively clean of DNA.

          • sillystrings

            keep saying it; maybe it will come true. Nope, sorry!
            there was not “tons” of any DNA at the scene, but there was DNA of all 3 murderers. No one, ever (get it?) has said that anyone, ever, selectively cleaned DNA (get it?).

          • Lysa De Thomas

            Wow. You sure didn’t read the transcripts of the trial did you? If you did, you would know that that is exactly what happen. When asked why there was no DNA of either Raffaele or Amanda in Meredith’s room, but plenty of Rudy’s, the prosecutor’s witness said that Amanda and Raffaela cleaned up theirs and left Rudy’s .

          • sillystrings

            no that is not what was said. either you can’t comprehend or it’s a translation problem

      • Nina Grey

        Shut up, you idiot. You don’t know a single fact about this case. You’re just an immoral liar who propagates on behalf of a convicted sadistic murderer. You shame humanity.

      • Smalldeer

        It’s so funny how guilters throw the word “immoral” around. One is “immoral” because they believe the evidence does not support her guilt. That’s not immoral, that’s logical.

        • Judge E.

          In less than an hour over tea and cakes, she admitted to police that she was present during the murder!

          Her blood and DNA are mixed with the victim’s in the bathroom, the hallway and a bedroom!

          Her boyfriend’s DNA is on the victim’s bra clasp!

          In law school, we were taught us that was EVIDENCE.

          • Fredly

            She lived there and that is the only reason her DNA is present. If they had control tested the other roommates they would have found their DNA mixed in with the blood as well.

          • Lysa De Thomas

            After an hour of tea and cakes?

            Come on, you know very well that she was interrogated for over 50 hours in 4 days and was refused food, water, bathroom breaks or a lawyer. She was screamed at, hit, and insulted. They tag teamed her, sending in two new officers every 20 minutes for hours on end. And you know what, she NEVER said that she did it. After all of that she was told to “imagine” what happened, she spoke about sitting in the kitchen and hearing screams. A statement that she recanted less than 24 hours later when she had actually had some food, water, and sleep.

          • sillystrings

            again, more rubbish. no 50 hours (how the heck did she make it to her piddly little language class, LOL), no refusal of water (what the hell does she need food for after she just came from eating pizza?); no refusal of a lawyer; don’t know if anyone screamed at her, don’t care; there was no tag teaming (so delusional); she never recanted her accusation which is why every single Judge (and there’s lots of them) found her GUILTY and she is a convicted felon (the fact that you think she did is evidence only of your rampant incomprehension problem).

          • Lysa De Thomas

            There are laws about how to interrogate people and none of them were followed. Instead tactics used to break Mafia Dons were used on a scared 20 year old girl in a language she couldn’t even put a complete sentence together in yet. No one, deserves that.

          • sillystrings

            in fact the laws werefollowed with respect to the witness interview. It was NOT an interrogation which even defence counsel admitted in Court. She had an interpreter and these “tactics” are a figment of your imagination. Even the liar herself doesn’t describe anything like that.

  • DevlinW

    Too bad that none of this so-called “information” from the Italian prosecutor is credible. He already has demonstrated he has a vendetta against Amanda Knox and has come up with multiple “theories” of why she committed this crime, none of which are actually supported by evidence. It’s obvious to any impartial observer of the events in this case that he bungled the original investigation of this case, contaminated the DNA, and now is dedicated to trying to save his reputation by saying anything he has to, whether it’s true or not, in order to get her convicted. Where is the proof of this so-called relationship with this drug dealer and why are we only hearing about it now? If he really had this evidence, don’t you think he would have presented it in any one of the court hearings in this case before now? If he only just discovered it, why didn’t he do a thorough job of investigating the case when the murder first happened instead of waiting until years later to suddenly “discover” such damning evidence? It’s all too pat for me. It simply comes down to an issue of his credibility, not Amanda Knox’s, and unfortunately he just doesn’t have any.

    • sillystrings

      the information is not from the prosecutor. it is a police report. it is obvious to any impartial observer that there is loads of evidence and the 3 of them are all guilty.Knox is the one with no credibility whatsoever.

      • DevlinW

        A police report that only surfaced now? That speaks well of the competence of the Italian police. Or was it available to the prosecutor all along but even he didn’t find it credible enough to introduce it in any of the trials or appeals they already had? That must make it really reliable.

        • sillystrings

          no it did NOT just surface now. you are deluded . the media is reporting on it now. The prosecutor could care less about it. his case is over. the prosecutor that cares about it is the one prosecuting the drug dealers. that’s right it wasn’t part of the trial or the appeals. it’s over for the 2 murderers. this drugstuff is not a part of that case. Get it?

          • DevlinW

            If it didn’t just surface now, why wasn’t it introduced in any of the trials or appeals? It would make a wonderful motive if it was true. No, you must be a member of the Kercher family, and Amanda Knox just HAS to be guilty so you can get some closure surrounding the death of Merideth. So sad.

          • sillystrings

            again, with the delusions. IT DOESN’T MATTER WHY IT WASN’T INTRODUCED (ITS PROBATIVE VALUE IS UP TO THE PROSECUTION TO DETERMINE AND THE PROOF OF IT MAY NOT HAVE COME UNTIL QUITE SOME TIME AFTER THE TRIAL). You have shown your true hateful colours by bringing up the victim’s family. You are a spiteful ignorant fool.

          • Kate Lane

            You can’t even spell Meredith’s name, you vicious, nasty, immoral liar.

          • Smalldeer

            Kate, take a look in the mirror and see who is actually a “vicious, nasty, immoral liar”.

          • Fredly

            Why did she test negative for cocaine when they tested her hair after she was arrested? A hair test would have indicated any cocaine use during the time she was in Italy.

          • sillystrings

            who cares.
            you obviously don’t get it

          • Fredly

            Who cares about the truth?

          • sillystrings

            not you
            the Court does – AND THIS STORY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE MURDER CASE

    • Fredly

      Mignini is a scumbag. He once falsely threw 20 people into jail and charged them with belonging to a Satanic cult.

      • sillystrings

        that’s not a real charge, so I guess you live in a parallel universe?

  • DevlinW

    It’s also too bad the author of this article isn’t a real professional reporter instead of some amateur playing at reporting. That’s one of the problems with the internet; it lets anyone claim to be a reporter and post garbage like this. There is absolutely no credibility to this story because there is no credibility to the supposed source for these so called “facts”. If Lacy Langley was a real reporter instead of some sort of a dilettante she would have checked the sources before publishing/posting this “story” and realized they lacked credibility before she put this nonsense out there for the world to read. Of course, if she had a read editor, they might have caught the lack of credible sources too before it was published, but nobody bothers with making sure the facts are accurate any more. Just rush to post some sensational “facts” out there and never mind the damage you might be doing to someone’s reputation. I hope she gets sued for libel for even “reporting” this nonsense. It’s not worthy of being called “reporting”; there used to be a name for this sort of thing in journalism schools and it was called “yellow journalism”.

    • sillystrings

      the source is credible. You only have to believethat it isn’tbecause you idolize a murderer.

      • Smalldeer

        Mignini is not credible

        • sillystrings

          Mignini is credible, but he’s not the source.

    • Michelle

      Amanda–did you change your name to Devlin?

  • rhr

    ” three people were in the house”? so they must be guilty?
    Italian due process and justice is a farce.
    Gaza is safer that Italy ……Stay home

  • mcwoods3

    Sounds like more Italian Justice to me! That countries is a joke!!

  • Kirkus1964

    This is a country where scientists were found guilty of manslaughter for not predicting earthquakes. Enough said.

    • sillystrings

      xenophobic much

      • Kirkus1964

        Facts aren’t xenophobic. I’ve traveled lived (for years) in several different countries.

        • sillystrings

          not a fact.
          and your statement is xenophobic.

  • Claude Balls

    that whore sure got around huh? GUILTY!

    • Fredly

      Fool. Why don’t you research the case?

  • BB

    This is getting more and more ridiculous! Although this “F” story is not relevant to the case, but let’s continue the witch hunt and print it on every newspaper’s front page, just to make her look guilty. The media are disgusting!

  • slowboat2

    She is a wise and worldly woman. Her background is of someone easily drifting in and out of the real world and a world of drugs and fast living. Drugs brings you in contact with a vertical ladder of strange bed-fellows at every rung.

    • Lysa De Thomas

      LOL- none of the girls were saints. Meredith, had a ” boyfriend” who wouldn’t even talk to her in public and grew pot in his house. The English friends who would get drunk nightly, and all the girls in the house would smoke. But Amanda was the “bad” one.

      • sillystrings

        what a load of rubbish

        • Lysa De Thomas

          Really, what part? That Meredith was dating, if you could call it that, a boy who lived downstairs who grew pot. It’s quite well documented in every book, pro or con Amanda and Raffaele as well as the police reports, and trial transcripts. They got together in the evenings since he wouldn’t speak to her around town. (

          That all the British girls, the ones who complained about Amanda’s weird behavior, went out drinking most every night? That too is quite well documented. (Read the police reports, trial transcripts – or can’t you read Italian and just base your opinion on what happened on the British tabloids?)

          That all the girls smoked. This was in the trial transcript.

          Look, all the girls were just that. College aged girls Meredith, (Amanda, and Meridith’s British Girl friends) or 20 somethings (Laura and

          • Lysa De Thomas

            Filomena) and they behaved in normal ways for girls this age, in this time. None were bad, but none were saints, and what happened is a horrendous tragedy beyond belief, but vilifying one of the girls, and her then boyfriend, for something they didn’t do, doesn’t bring justice, it just destroys lives even further.

          • sillystrings

            the reason Knox is “bad” is because she is a convicted felon and a murderer. obviously no one is a saint. I could list for you all the facts that make Knox look bad (only relevant in that her family has invented a perfect angel Amanda that doesn’t exist) but I could really care less. If she hadn’t murdered, I’m sure I would not like her (just like most others) but I would not say she was “bad.” No one has been vilified, just tried and found guilty, in a fair and just Court of Law.

          • sillystrings

            the part where you don’tknow what you’re talking about – so all. I know already that the police reports and trial transcripts are only believed by you when they are not a detriment to the Knox murderer, LOL. BTW could care less about this anyway; it is not relevant to the guilt of the Knox murderer, but bang on about it anyway. good luck with that.

  • Will

    If they find her guilty and Italy wants her back, just put a bounty on her….Money talks!!!….If the bounty is high enough, she WILL be returned to Italy….Whether our government wants her to be or not!!!….Just put up the $$$….Make her a WORLDWIDE fugitive from justice….It won’t take long!

    • jajaja

      You’re an idiot. Italy simply has to request her extradition and she will be sent back.

    • Sjdsgirl

      You’re creeping me out.

  • jody

    I think this guy was mentioned in her book, just not by name. She talks about meeting a guy when she and her sister first got to Italy. She left her sister in the hotel and she went off with this guy and spent the night with him, while her sister was worried sick about her back at the hotel.

    • Smalldeer

      The guy she met on the train name was Cristiano and she did not sleep with him.

      • Speakfortruth

        EXACTLY… thanks Smalldeer..
        Not that the truth matters to these people..

        • dylan

          AK changed the name that she wrote earlier. Truth means nothing to her. Fooling the gullible does.

      • dylan

        She changed his name for her book , We have her writing his real name in her diary. She changes lots in her book tweaking here and there. She is a convicted liar.

  • Paula Hannah-Mauri

    IF IRRELEVANT WHY IS IT BEING PUBLISHED. SENSATIONALISM ONLY!! LEAVE THE GIRL ALONE!!

    • sillystrings

      it’s a story – that’s why – the media is not a Court of law. Of course if it was in favour of Knox (no matter how irrelevant to the case) you would think it was great!

      • Paula Hannah-Mauri

        Since you don’t know me isn’t it a little presumptuous to tell me what I would think is great. Argue with facts, not innuendos that are unfounded and meaningless.

        • sillystrings

          it is obvious to anyone with a functioning brain. The story is based on FACTS.

          • Paula Hannah-Mauri

            oh brother!!! end of conversation with you.

          • sillystrings

            that’s good since you have yet to make any sense.

  • Danny Stilletto

    Known ties to a drug ring?
    Anyone who knows a guy who knows a guy who sells drugs has known ties to a drug ring according to most authorities. So what?
    It’s quite transparent the Italian authorities are grasping at straws now.
    Plus one person killed her roommate and it was either the Guede guy or Knox but it cannot be both. Plus Guede’s DNA and his admission all but sealed his fate. Enough already with prosecuting a young women who had no prior history of violence and who was interrogated by police without council and without knowing the language.
    These new revelations or shall I say accusations mean nothing.

    • jajaja

      why cant it be both?

      • Danny Stilletto

        Because of the evidence found. Only footprints and DNA of Guede was found in Kercher’s room and no other footprints of anyone else was found in that room. Plus if Knox did do it. Why didn’t she just simply fly back to the US? She had plenty of opportunity to do so.

        • sillystrings

          because she’s a sociopath.

          • Danny Stilletto

            So now you’re a psychiatrist. Dr Sillistrings I take it.
            To be honest with you. I think you’re more crazy than Knox or most anyone else is.
            Either way. Good luck with that….

          • sillystrings

            yes I am.
            your “honesty” is inane. Thanks.
            Bye.

    • sillystrings

      the Italian authorities have nothing to do with this story.
      actually it can be more than one person, and it was.
      Guede made no admission of guilt.
      All 3 of them had no prior history of violence. so what.
      She was not interrogated without counsel, and the statements she made prior to being cautioned were not part of the trial(she kindly repeated them anyway trying to convince the police she was afraid of Patrick). She had an interpreter at all times.

      • Danny Stilletto

        You’re wrong Guede did have a criminal history.

        In fact he was caught breaking into someone’s house just the week before Meredith’s murder. In fact he was caught with a large knife and a stolen laptop in his backpack. Again just the week before.

        Did you really not know that?

        Also while Guede was on the run he contacted a friend via Skype and told them Amanda was not there the night of the murder.

        Did you not know that as well?

        Also did you not know Guede basically got his 30 year sentence cut in half after implicating Knox and her boyfriend.

        That’s a really good incentive to lie to authorities about what happened.

        Wouldn’t you say?

        • sillystrings

          that’s right, no history of violence.
          no he was not caught breaking into someone’s house.
          he had NO CRIMINAL RECORD.
          He was charged with possession of stolen property – so no history of violence.
          Did you really not know that?
          Guede said a lot of things while in Germany, including statements implicating Sollecito and Knox. what of it?
          What I know, because it is a fact, is that Guede got a sentence reduction of 1/3 due to choosing a fast track trial. This is an automatic reduction and there was no deal; deals are not allowed. The Court gave the sentence; not the prosecutor.
          No question Guede is a liar, just as Knox is, and Sollecito is.

          • Danny Stilletto

            Also you’re obviously going to believe what you want. Despite the evidence to the contrary.
            That’s fine but I will choose to believe the more likely and logical scenario which is the ONE person who killed Kercher was Guede. The DNA and the prints found on the same night of the crime prove it.
            So you can go ahead and believe what you want. That’s fine I have no problem with people believing in Bigfoot and the Lochness Monster either but I choose not to believe in fairy tales.
            Good luck with that….

          • sillystrings

            you must be speaking to yourself. I only believe facts
            you believe in fairy-tales that suit your bias.
            the evidence proves all 3 were there.
            the evidence proves Knox is a liar.
            You can go aheadand believe in your fantasies instead of the truth. I don’ wish you any luck.

          • Danny Stilletto

            No I’m speaking to you and you alone. Not myself.
            Knox may be a liar but that does not make her a cold blooded murderer.
            If that were the only criteria for a killer we’d all be guilty of it.
            Again I wish you luck and more often than not in cases such as this. The simplest and most obvious conclusion is the correct one.
            Have a good day.

          • sillystrings

            she’s a liar and a murderer.
            the most obvious conclusion is that she is a murderer.
            you don’t know anything – about me or about this case. You don’t know the meaning of the word “objective.”
            Aloha.

          • Danny Stilletto

            Not to someone who can see things objectively.
            I can tell by the emotion you express in your words that’s not you.
            Anyways, you have a good day and good luck.

          • Lysa De Thomas

            If the evidence proves that all three were there, why is only Rudy’s at the murder scene?

          • sillystrings

            first, FYI – DNA is not the only evidence, and is not needed to prove guilt. plus DNA of all 3 was found at the scene.
            look up the definition of evidence – it doesn’t say “DNA.”
            go and watch CSI – and live in the TV world – LOL
            this is the real world.

          • Danny Stilletto

            Also you keep pointing out that Guede had no criminal record. May I ask why? Because if you look at my earlier posts I don’t accuse him of having had one.

          • sillystrings

            you stated he had a criminal history – no criminal record means no criminal history – although I know in your world innocent until proven guilty only applies to Knox!

          • Danny Stilletto

            No those are two completely different things. One is a record that can be held against you. It can keep you from voting or owning a gun and it can also keep you from getting a job. The other is not.
            Although Trayvon Martin had a history of some criminal activity. Such as fighting and stealing he actually had no criminal RECORD.
            You see the difference now, Sherlock?

          • sillystrings

            no they are not completely different things. criminal means having committed a crime- – and it is still innocent until proven guilty – for everyone!!

          • Lysa De Thomas

            Rudy told his friend in his first skype talk that “the girl in the news wasn’t there”.

            Rudy also had a history of breaking and entering via throwing a rock through a second story window and climbing in. He would eat food from the house use the toilet and not flush, and steal money, credit cards, and cell phone, all things that He did that day. Amanda and Raffaele had no similar histories.

          • sillystrings

            that’snotall that Guede said, but please pick and choose only what supports the murderer LOL.
            Rudy is a liar.
            Rudy has no proven history of breaking and entering anywhere or anything else you have written.
            Knox has a history of staging a break-in.
            RS likes to carry knives.
            All 3 are guilty, based on the evidence, not their histories.

  • jajaja

    She’ll be heading back to Italy soon to prison as soon as Italy requests her extradition. Unless of course her appeal succeeds which I doubt it will.

  • jajaja

    She falsely accused another guy of the murder.. that right there tells you what she truly is.. a Lying sociopath.. Imagine if that guy she falsely accused was convicted.. Do you think she would have came forward and said she lied? Or went on her merry way? She is a piece of trash that I am sure had involvement in the murder…

    • Jackie

      jajaja, she was a 19 year old young naive, immature girl who was scared out of her mind. She had no family, no lawyer present, was alone the whole time while being interrogated over and over and over by the Italian police and in a country where she spent all of 3 weeks. She is innocent, plain and simple and she is not a sociopath. The sociopath is the Prosecutor who will stop at nothing to get an “american” found guilty.

      • sillystrings

        No. she was not naïve, and an adult. The only thing she was scared of was being found out; that is obvious from all her statements and behaviour.
        She was not questioned any more than the other witnesses prior to her being cautioned; after that she had a lawyer. She is not innocent, plain and simple. She is most likely a sociopath, or at the very least has narcissistic personality disorder.

        • Lysa De Thomas

          No, she was questioned over and over. Over 50 hours in 4 days. When she asked if she should get a lawyer, she was told by the officers that would make things worse for her. In fact, she did not even meet her lawyer until after she had been in solitary confinement for many days.

          • sillystrings

            no, she wasn’t.
            she never asked if she could get a lawyer; she’s a LIAR.
            you really have fallen for the PR hired by the murderer right after she was arrested, haven’t you?
            Good luck with that.

  • John Weber

    I would totally slam that ass!!!!!!

  • Dark Ages

    So now she is guilty because she had sexual relationship with a cocaine dealer who repeatedly sold drugs to a
    man named Luciano who stabbed his brother 16 times with a kitchen
    knife.
    You can’t make this stuff up!!!

    • dylan

      Mignini said it will not affect the outcome of the case , so in other words that is not the reason they will find her guilty. It is only of interest to what kind of risks she took , and where she might have spent so much money while in. Perugia. Meredith probably had an idea of how low AK had sunk and disapproved of her connections. They had so little in common which must have been so apparent at the time of the murder.

  • Jackie

    Most of you people who think Amanda Knox is guilty are from outside the United States I’m almost sure of that and we know what most of you think of the United States, so my guess is you just want to see an “American” found guilty. Amanda Knox is innocent and just the fact that the Italian courts and the Prosecutor comes up with a different story each time they are prosecuting her, tells me a lot about the Italian justice system. They botched up the investigation so bad and they know it, therefore, they don’t want to look bad so they will do anything to find Amanda and Raphael guilty and come up with lies to do just that. This is turning into a circus and its pretty disgusting to me. Leave her alone now and let her and Raphael move on with their life. I feel for Meredith’s family but justice has been served, they have the right guy in jail.

    • sillystrings

      wrong; completely and totally and utterly wrong. Yes, Knox PR is a circus.

  • arrrrrb

    I am sure a lot of people could be linked to drug dealer that sold to a guy that had a cousin who knew a guy that stabbed someone. WTF?

  • Shaun Hammel

    ‘Allegedly’ this story was written by an alleged professional journalist, but it my alleged opinion that allegedly she is not.

  • Geronimo Smith

    KEYWORD in this article is ALLEGED.. so why evbother bringing it up.?

  • Nomar

    the fact this took this long to come out, is such a joke – not saying she is innocent but the Italian justice system is so messed up that she will not go to prison

    • sillystrings

      it didn’t take this long to come out – just the media reporting now.
      she will go to prison; she is guilty.

  • Anna Olson Grass

    a guy I knew a guy was a major dealer in the 70’s. Does that make me an accomplice to drug dealing? I wasn’t selling drugs, I dated him occasionally.

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Camp Denial Of Drug-Trafficking-Ring Link
    Many Now Digging Bigger and Deeper Holes
    http://t.CO/k5HvxG5nFR

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Let’s support lovely Selene Nelson by reading her hard-hitting piece on the #AmandaKnox case. http://t.CO/THUv0Ktt0r

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Forensic evidence against #AmandaKnox’s boyfriend, #raffaelesollecito: footprint on bathmat http://t.CO/0rer31EPtI

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Read why the courts thought there was a cleanup by #AmandaKnox in the hallway http://t.CO/UKQPU6DrAg

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    #deannaknox faces lifetime of underemployment and distrust for lying for #amandaknox

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Why hasn’t #AmandaKnox spoken out against attacks on family of “her friend”? http://t.CO/ohqXehTcfB

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    ” No indication that Italian law was not followed” https://t.CO/bKD7hRM1PD “there was someone who was killed here”

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Ex-FBI husband of woman who assaulted respected Italian prosecutor in a scathing attack on #amandaknox’s PR firm

    https://twitter.COM/Jim_and_Hardy/status/495080793744883712/photo/1

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    It’s sad #amandaknox’s family was so ashamed of real daughter that they invented an imaginary one for public to support

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Ex-FBI husband of woman who assaulted respected Italian prosecutor in a scathing attack on #amandaknox’s PR firm

    https://twitter.COM/Jim_and_Hardy/status/495080793744883712/photo/1

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    #rudyguede to visit #amandaknox & #raffaelesollecito in prison when he is free

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    #AmandaKnox immediately following discovery of Meredith’s body. Does she look sad or upset, or does she look anxious?
    http://pbs.twimg.COM/media/Bl6gRWXCIAAUZqn.jpg

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    AmandaKnox admits previously staging a break in. Part of a ‘hazing prank’. Flatmates NOT impressed.
    http://pbs.twimg.COM/media/BnBw0zhCQAENQyq.png:medium

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    #amandaknox Biological parents lied to the people of #Seattle & #USA about the interrogation

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Was #AmandaKnox in a relationship with Rudy Guede? Was he the beautiful black boy she described in her diary?

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Has 90 days to appeal Waits till 90th day to appeal #amandaknox #Guilty

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Amandaknox,Michellesings- Trending Photos and Videos
    http://www.veooz.COM/media/DHKYzUH/gallery

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    #amandaknox bloody shoeprint in #merediths room

    http://pbs.twimg.COM/media/Bq4JIWDCEAAxmgT.jpg:large

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    #amandaknox was insanely jealous of #meredithkerchers natural grace,emotional intlligence,sheer intellect and easy ability to make real genuine friendships.

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Why is October month missing from #amandaknox PDF phone records published by her and her supporters?

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo
  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Dismantling the Amanda Knox ‘Victim’ Myth; Why The Facts Just Speak For Themselves

    July 31, 2014

    http://ireport.cnn.COM/docs/DOC-1157346

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    #AmandaKnox caught on CCTV off to meet her cocaine supplier on the night of the murder?

    https://twitter.COM/RandomCheerMan/status/494821335768793088/photo/1

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Translation of official police report confirming #AmandaKnox link to drug dealer http://t.CO/J5wfT8YZDP

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Does #amandaknox look as if she’s had 10 hrs sleep showered & washed her hair or been up all night cleaning

    https://twitter.COM/Knox_Guilty/status/494797914938822656/photo/1

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    LAW PROFESSOR: If Italy Asks, The US WILL Turn Over Amanda Knox

    http://t.CO/IolhEeNPwa

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    “She will be extradited if it’s upheld,” said Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz.

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Case Statement Analysis Absurd & Ludicrous Claims By Steve Moore About Investigations

    http://t.CO/xCNWxLj0xB

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    #amandaknox did coke it wasn’t detectable by 6Nov.thanks

    http://t.CO/4jTWutXsRo

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    New BBC Documentary Establishes #amandaknox is guilty

    https://t.CO/IN4oA0AsIR

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Dr Mignini warned… ‘She knows how to lie very well, She had plenty of time to tell her truth’ #amandaknox

    https://twitter.COM/Knox_Guilty/status/494518867503624192/photo/1

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    “They always forget #amandaknox was convicted first,” Julian Ku, who teaches transnational law at Hofstra University

    http://t.CO/jsdG5x2EjZ

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    “if #Amandaknox lied […], it’s because she didn’t want to admit doing something that’s a crime.”

    Words of wisdom from @JimClemente

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    #MeredithKercher case: #AmandaKnox withdrew €1,250 in just one week in Perugia (21-09 to 28-09). Rent was only €300.

    http://t.CO/gGPQtW6nZC

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Alan Dershowitz and CNN’s Paul Callan explain why #amandaknox’s conviction makes sense and why we will extradite her http://t.CO/K9LsZ5YsoA

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Three drug dealers in Perugia convicted based on information found in #amandaknox’s telephone http://t.CO/cMOlf8HbvV

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Best For All To Remember THE REPREHENSIBLE CONDUCT OF Hellmann, Vecchioti & Stefano Conti http://

    http://t.CO/JTBwJc26co

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Meredith Kercher’s friends back in Perugia on the way to testify at Massei trial.#amandaknox said what nobody knew same night of MK’s murder.

    http://t.CO/JKMrJJAPBr

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Still, grief and trauma affect everyone differently. Others weep, #AmandaKnox parties.

    https://twitter.COM/santamariaxx/status/494417272858238976/photo/1

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    #MeredithKercher case: #AmandaKnox lawyer Ted Simon b4 & after being hired.

    Then: http://t.CO/tfP8R2FN3d
    Now: http://t.CO/bmCNIPEnr2

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Amanda Knox and the Seattle News Conspiracy

    http://justice4ever.COM/2014/07/amanda-knox-seattle-news-blackout/

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo
  • Paul Revere

    Why can’t Americans work as diligently and thoroughly as you Mr. Curatolo?

    • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

      LOL! Thank you Paul! 😀

    • Speakfortruth

      Um…because most people have lives…
      Where as Antonio here has been dead for over 2 years and….
      Being dead and all he doesn’t really have a lot of commitments….

    • JC Court

      There is nothing diligent about the poster named Curatolo, he is just another fraudster in the Knox case. Thanks.

  • Paul Revere

    BTW. Speakfortruth and Exonerate_Knox sound like different people. Exonerate_Knox is much harsher and to me sounds more like Amanda. Maybe she is a multiple personality? Like Sybil? Maybe Speak is MadPax?

    • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

      Very possible. Thank you Paul.

    • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

      Check out the comments by HateWatch on http://t.CO/THUv0Ktt0r

      He totally OWNS Bruce Fischer and dmontz! Awesome! 😀

    • Speakfortruth

      Maybe Speakfortruth is just Speakfortruth….
      Just a thought…LOL….

      • Paul Revere

        How does @Exonerate_Knox know this info?

        Exonerate Knox ‏@Exonerate_Knox 1h

        @cate69 @MargaretCoetzee @MrTonyMan @albinaperri @santamariaxx tortured!?! Hardly. She was hit once, so hard she probably blacked out.

  • Elle Chanel

    She did not kill her room mate and had nothing to do with it. There is no evidence. The end.

    • sillystrings

      She is responsible for the murder of her roommate. There is loads of evidence. The End.

      • Elle Chanel

        There is NO evidence – are you ok?

        • sillystrings

          i’m great. you are misinformed.

          • Elle Chanel

            Yes you are misinformed. Had you read the case, you would know that there is no physical evidence and the murderer is already in prison. But I realize there are a lot of morons, and in any case, she is free and will remain so. So, since you have some strange obsession of hatred for Ms. Knox – too bad for you that she is free and living life happily.

          • sillystrings

            there is plenty of evidence, physical and otherwise .I realize also that there are a lot of morons who believe a murderer’s self-serving book, and a public relations firm hired by said murderer, instead of facts and evidence. You have some strange obsession with Knox and disregard for the victim and the victim’s family (who want the guiltyparties to pay for their crime and who have access to the entire case file) – too bad for you that your idol will be foundguilty and will be extradited. (for now she is freebut not happy)

  • nt

    the italians need to really try harder and find the actual killer instead of wasting time and efforts to convict Amanda. I do not beleive she killed anyone, other than the unfortunate situation she found herself in..wrong place at the wrong time..leave her the hell alone…

    • sillystrings

      they already found the 3 killers. Justice for Meredith.

  • changeling

    AMANDA KNOX IS THE PERSONIFICATION OF E.V.I.L. PERIOD! In any case, the TV show above should go back and analyze the infamous Sacco & Vanzetti case and electrocute the relatives of the long-dead judge who WRONGLY prosecuted S & V way back when:):)!!. PERIOD!

    • Fredly

      Mignini is a corrupt as the judge who convicted S&V. You are as ignorant as the people who cheered on their conviction without evidence,.

      • sillystrings

        she wasn’t convicted by Mignini, who was only one of several prosecutors doing their job for justice

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Five florida teens beat and rape girl after smoking pot and drinking http://t.CO/HOIdNaUK6H

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    It’s sad #amandaknox’s family was so ashamed of real daughter that they invented an imaginary one for public to support

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    #deannaknox faces lifetime of underemployment and distrust for lying for #amandaknox

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    #amandaknox’s German Obersturmführer’s family link will be disclosed…it will rock America…especially #Seattle

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    #rudyguede to visit #amandaknox & #raffaelesollecito in prison when he is free

    • Paul Revere

      How does @Exonerate_Knox person know this info?

      Exonerate Knox ‏@Exonerate_Knox 1h

      @cate69 @MargaretCoetzee @MrTonyMan @albinaperri @santamariaxx tortured!?! Hardly. She was hit once, so hard she probably blacked out.

      • dylan

        Why would Exonerate Knox know how many blows.What reason would she have to try to lesson the pain and fear Meredith felt? Sounds like she is trying to minimize the violence. Would she do that for Guede? Absolutely not , so who then?

  • Paul Revere

    Why does Speakfortruth pretend to be Amanda Knox?

    • Speakfortruth

      I have never pretended to be Amanda Knox. I have stated repeatedly I am NOT Amanda Knox.
      You are not an indecent person Paul, so I will ask you to please stop insinuating something that was conceived totally out of Johnny Yen’s imagination.

      • Paul Revere

        Yes you have liar.

        • Speakfortruth

          Ok, I misjudged you.
          For the record, I am not Amanda Knox, my name is Karen.
          Have a nice day.

        • JC Court

          Calling others what you are? No Thanks.

        • Speakfortruth

          Ok then,..

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    #amandaknox did coke it wasn’t detectable by 6Nov.thanks

    http://t.CO/4jTWutXsRo

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Alan Dershowitz and CNN’s Paul Callan explain why #amandaknox’s conviction makes sense and why we will extradite her http://t.CO/K9LsZ5YsoA

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Best For All To Remember THE REPREHENSIBLE CONDUCT OF Hellmann, Vecchioti & Stefano Conti http://

    http://t.CO/JTBwJc26co

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Meredith Kercher’s friends back in Perugia on the way to testify at Massei trial.#amandaknox said what nobody knew same night of MK’s murder.

    http://t.CO/JKMrJJAPBr

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Still, grief and trauma affect everyone differently. Others weep, #AmandaKnox parties.

    https://twitter.COM/santamariaxx/status/494417272858238976/photo/1

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    #stevemoore will have a lot of explaining to do once Cassation upholds #AmandaKnox conviction. Probably will become unemployed again.

    • JC Court

      The Italian supreme court (Cassation) has already broken Italian laws when they ordered a re trial in the Knox case. Thanks.

      • sillystrings

        there’s never been a “re trial.” that’s a fact

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Very interesting comments by Michelle about AK47’s current Seattle distrust and UW excommunication:

    http://justice4ever.COM/2014/07/amanda-knox-seattle-news-blackout/

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Read more about the mind of Amanda Knox (in her own words) here:

    https://patrishka.wordpress.COM/2009/12/18/amanda-knox/

    • JC Court

      Antonio Curatolo is the name of the so called prosecution super witness in the Knox case, he was a known heroin dealer that was used as a witness in other cases. (a serial witness). He was discredited in the appeal’s court and subsequently found dead while incarcerated. Thanks.

      • sillystrings

        he was not discredited – part of the reason the appeal decision was thrown out harshly

  • JC Court

    MS Knox is a victim. All the so called evidence was made up by unscrupulous prosecutors. Thanks.

    • sillystrings

      Knox is a murderer. No evidence was “made up” by anyone. Thanks.

  • http://www.truejustice.org/ Antonio Curatolo

    Desperate #amandaknox PR and paid tweeters have been caught out lying again…twisting DNA expert Peter Gill’s words:

    https://twitter.COM/Knox_Guilty/status/495707182714093568/photo/1

  • the-real

    She is a murderous little coke-slut!! Very easy to figure that out!!!

  • Nicholas Roach

    It doesn’t matter if she was having sex with Berlusconi or the Pope. This drug dealer has no relevance to the case. Guilt by association with bad people is not evidence of murder.

    • sillystrings

      and no one said it was

  • Dennis Pennington

    This man Mignini must be an idiot. He even says that Knox “knows how to lie very well.” With the murderer in prison already, Mignini made a deal to have Knox and her boyfriend brought in on this murder and there never was any evidence against them.
    Mignini had determined in advance that they were guilty. Read his stuff well and you can see this.
    As for the “new evidence” I have located a dope dealer named L that said he supplied dope to Oswald and that Oswald admitted to him that he was going to kill JFK. Isn’t it sensational?
    Some of you people need to wake up and realize what evidence and the lack of it really mean.

    • sillystrings

      yes,she doesn’t really lie very well at all. There was no deal with anyone, ever; they don’t make deals with murderers in Italy – that’s a US thing.
      No, the initial prosecutor did NOT determine in advance that they were guilty, and there is nothing to support this theory (or Knox PR talking point).
      There is no new evidence; it’s the same evidence as always. This cocaine stuff is not only not new it also has nothing to do with the murder case.
      Some of you people need to wake up and realize what evidence and a lot of it really means, instead of xenophobia,bias and belief in the lies of a proven liar and convicted felon (Knox).

      • Dennis Pennington

        Sillystrings, you need to Google Mignini and see how he thought and dealt with “the monster of Florence” to understand how he thinks and what went on here. The man is right out of a bad horror movie. Yes, he did make a deal with Geude, promising him less prison time if he would implicate Knox and her boyfriend.

        You talk of evidence, and a lot of it. What evidence? There is no DNA to link Knox and her boyfriend with the crime. Washing that away and leaving only the DNA of Geude is an impossible feat. Knox was deemed “guilty” when she did cartwheels at the police station, repeatedly put little “pecky” kisses on her boyfriend, and did other things that are not done openly in Italy. Knox is not that good at speaking Italian, but insisted on no interpreter, and the police talked her into a false confession involving a former employee. Is this Knox lying or is it the police and continual pressing. Then Mignini brings out that even in high school Knox was known as “foxy knoxy.”
        What does any of the above have to do with investigation of a murder? It’s all a bad dream or a bad movie. Google “monster of Florence” and read all about Mignini.

        • sillystrings

          what you find through Google is not necessarily the truth. No, you don’t know “how he thinks.”He had very little to do with that case. Which BTW has nothingto do with this case.
          Do you havesome proof of a deal? No, of course not.Because it didn’t happen. I do have proof that Guede chose fast-track (his lawyer said) and this fast-track gives an automatic sentence reduction (as per Italian law) and deals for murderers are not allowed (as per Italian law)and there is the fact that if Guede had a deal he certainly did not produce much in exchange (his “statement” was a joke). EVERY ACCUSED IN ITALY WHO CHOOSES FAST TRACK GETS 1/3 REDUCTION JUST LIKE GUEDE.
          No one purposely washed just DNA away; so stupid.
          Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence – FACT.
          Yes, her behaviour was suspicious — EVERYONE FOUND IT SUSPICIOUS including Meredith’s friends.
          She had an interpreter;FACT.
          She accused, she didn’t confess. No police coercion – nothing to support it
          what former employee? LOL
          Knox felt it importantthat she was “Foxy Knoxy” -she brought it up not Mignini – also – who cares.
          all of the evidence points to her – DNA evidence is not needed and many murderers are convicted without it – although THERE IS DNA EVIDENCE inthis case, no matter how muchyour confirmation bias blinds youto it.

          “Shit happens.”
          “She F…… bed to death.”

  • sc_cannon

    The only question is why is Sollecito saying that Amanda was not with him all night when she says she was. My guess is that it is because he is in Italy and could be charged with slander for making a false statement to the cops, like Amanda was for naming Lumbuba. I know that the cops said that is what he said during the interrogation and it was not clear from her book whether he had taken that back. Personally I believe her more than him, for one thing she testified and he did not.

    • sillystrings

      she testified and showed her guilt for all to see. His lawyers wisely kept him shut up for the most part.